The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

DTST · Technology · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

KRFG · Technology · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

WDAY · Technology · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

GDRX · Technology · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureDTSTKRFGWDAYGDRX
Moat Score (0–100)45 (highest)45 (highest)45 (highest)45 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend605590 (highest)63
Pricing power60 (highest)45——
Returns on capital4 (highest)—00
Balance-sheet safety55 (highest)55 (highest)4437
Capital allocation44244478 (highest)
333% above value if growth stopped todayNo price dataNo price data33% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)
Market cap$25.2M$2.6MNot reported$1.3B
Moat tierShallow moatShallow moatShallow moatShallow moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2026FY2026FY2025