The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
WDAY · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
GDRX · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | DTST | MBLY | WDAY | GDRX |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 45 (highest) | 45 (highest) | 45 (highest) | 45 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 60 | 51 | 90 (highest) | 63 |
| Pricing power | 60 | 74 (highest) | — | — |
| Returns on capital | 4 (highest) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) | 44 | 37 |
| Capital allocation | 44 | 44 | 44 | 78 (highest) |
| 318% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | No price data | 12% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $24.3M | Not reported | Not reported | $1.1B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 |