The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
DXC · Technology · Shallow moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
PRKR · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | DXC | FDCTD | RSKIA | PRKR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 59 (highest) | 59 (highest) | 59 (highest) | 59 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 15 | 85 (highest) | 50 | 85 (highest) |
| Pricing power | — | 53 | 80 (highest) | 70 |
| Returns on capital | 70 (highest) | 12 | 17 | — |
| Balance-sheet safety | 50 | 100 (highest) | 73 | 55 |
| Capital allocation | 100 (highest) | 44 | 73 | 24 |
| 89% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | No price data | 100% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | |
| Market cap | $1.6B | Not reported | $160M | $14.3M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |