The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
VSTD · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
RGS · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | DXLG | VSTD | RGS | CVU |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 35 (highest) | 35 (highest) | 35 (highest) | 35 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 18 | 70 (highest) | 40 | 15 |
| Pricing power | 68 (highest) | — | — | 0 |
| Returns on capital | 12 | 0 | 5 | 83 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 (highest) | 28 | 28 | 55 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 24 | 44 | 69 (highest) | 24 |
| No price data | No price data | No price data | 29% below value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | Not reported | Not reported | $68.2M | $62M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2026 | FY2024 | FY2025 | FY2025 |