The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
BLGO · Materials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The businessTrend component abstained: Only one aligned fiscal year of revenue and diluted EPS is available; a trend needs at least two observations. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | DYNR | MLKN | BLGO | CLF |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 32 (highest) | 32 (highest) | 32 (highest) | 32 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 55 (highest) | 54 | — | 20 |
| Pricing power | 0 | 63 | 68 (highest) | 1 |
| Returns on capital | 12 | 18 | 0 | 67 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 37 (highest) | 12 | 28 | 28 |
| Capital allocation | 56 (highest) | 16 | 34 | 44 |
| 56% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 19% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | 14% below value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $18.5M | $1.5B | Not reported | $6.8B |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 |