The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
CRAI · Consumer Discretionary · Wide moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
BBW · Consumer Discretionary · Wide moat
Wonderful & reasonably priced
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | EAT | CRAI | BBW | WING |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 86 (highest) | 86 (highest) | 86 (highest) | 86 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 90 | 90 | 89 | 100 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 100 (highest) | — | 77 | 99 |
| Returns on capital | 97 | 93 | — | 100 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 66 | 61 | 78 (highest) | 40 |
| Capital allocation | 76 | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 88 |
| 382% above value if growth stopped today | 93% above value if growth stopped today | 25% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 378% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $8.3B | $1.1B | $432M | $3.7B |
| Moat tier | Wide moat | Wide moat | Wide moat | Wide moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 |