The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
TXRH · Consumer Discretionary · Wide moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | EAT | TXRH | CPRT | SFM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 94 | 96 (highest) | 94 | 92 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 95 | 95 | 91 | 99 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 100 (highest) | — | 100 (highest) | 60 |
| Returns on capital | 97 | 97 | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 83 | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 93 | 93 | 79 | 100 (highest) |
| 399% above value if growth stopped today | 215% above value if growth stopped today | 61% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 109% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $8.6B | $11.0B | $24.3B | $6.2B |
| Moat tier | Wide moat | Wide moat | Wide moat | Wide moat |
| Filing date | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 |