The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

EFOI · Industrials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

LIQT · Industrials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The businessTrend component abstained: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

CVR · Industrials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

OCC · Industrials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The businessTrend component abstained: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureEFOILIQTCVROCC
Moat Score (0–100)25 (highest)25 (highest)25 (highest)25 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend20 (highest)20 (highest)
Pricing power50447 (highest)
Returns on capital0 (highest)0 (highest)0 (highest)0 (highest)
Balance-sheet safety55 (highest)55 (highest)55 (highest)28
Capital allocation44 (highest)44 (highest)44 (highest)24
No price dataNo price dataNo price data2283% above value if growth stopped today
Market cap$18.1M$6.3M$9.4M$119M
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025