The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
EGY · Materials · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
CNR · Materials · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | EGY | AMRZ | PKG | CNR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 60 (highest) | 60 (highest) | 60 (highest) | 60 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 50 | 71 (highest) | 56 | 55 |
| Pricing power | — | 44 (highest) | 38 | — |
| Returns on capital | 91 (highest) | 86 | 71 | 88 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 | 33 | 73 (highest) | 55 |
| Capital allocation | 44 | 66 (highest) | 62 | 42 |
| Around the value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 63% above value if growth stopped today | 232917% above value if growth stopped today | 25% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $646M | $21.4B | $21.05T | $4.6B |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |