The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
EIX · Utilities · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
CPK · Utilities · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | EIX | CPK | CETY | ORA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 38 | 39 (highest) | 39 (highest) | 37 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 83 | 87 | 55 | 100 (highest) |
| Pricing power | — | — | 39 | 54 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 5 (highest) | 0 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 8 | 4 | 55 (highest) | 0 |
| Capital allocation | 60 (highest) | 60 (highest) | 44 | 31 |
| 131% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 226% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | 337% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $30.7B | $3.3B | $8.7M | $6.0B |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |