The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
EMN · Materials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The balanceSheet component abstained: Insufficient leverage/coverage inputs to score the balance sheet. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
PED · Materials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
DD · Materials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | EMN | PED | DD | PROP |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 31 | 32 (highest) | 32 (highest) | 31 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 26 | 55 | 25 | 70 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 39 (highest) | — | 32 | 6 |
| Returns on capital | 46 (highest) | 0 | — | 9 |
| Balance-sheet safety | — | 28 (highest) | 26 | 28 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 14 | 44 (highest) | 44 (highest) | 44 (highest) |
| 60% above value if growth stopped today | 58% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | $15.3B | $57.3M | Not reported | $50M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |