The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

ENDV · Healthcare · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

RSCF · Healthcare · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

LYRA · Healthcare · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

JAZZ · Healthcare · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureENDVRSCFLYRAJAZZ
Moat Score (0–100)39 (highest)39 (highest)39 (highest)39 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend15135762 (highest)
Pricing power7094 (highest)
Returns on capital9028 (highest)
Balance-sheet safety2855 (highest)55 (highest)28
Capital allocation44 (highest)2444 (highest)39
No price data245% above value if growth stopped todayNo price dataNo price data
Market cap$21323$3.4M$922939$15.6B
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filing dateFY2022FY2023FY2025FY2025