The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
EONR · Materials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | EONR | HUN | WLK | MAGN |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 25 (highest) | 25 (highest) | 25 (highest) | 25 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 20 | 10 | 27 | 60 (highest) |
| Pricing power | — | 19 (highest) | 5 | 1 |
| Returns on capital | 9 | 33 (highest) | 20 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 (highest) | 0 | 28 (highest) | 0 |
| Capital allocation | 44 | 64 (highest) | 46 | 64 (highest) |
| No price data | 11% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 3% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | |
| Market cap | Not reported | $1.5B | $8.1B | $417M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |