The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
DTII · Materials · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | EPC | LBRT | OII | DTII |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 46 | 47 (highest) | 47 (highest) | 46 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 38 | 65 | 84 (highest) | 70 |
| Pricing power | 73 (highest) | 9 | 0 | 17 |
| Returns on capital | 53 | 65 (highest) | 11 | — |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 50 | 71 (highest) | 55 |
| Capital allocation | 40 | 44 | 67 (highest) | 44 |
| 13% below value if growth stopped today | 18% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 364% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | |
| Market cap | $1.3B | $2.9B | $5.2B | $512218 |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |