The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

ES · Utilities · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

OGE · Utilities · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

YORW · Utilities · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

BKH · Utilities · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureESOGEYORWBKH
Moat Score (0–100)32 (highest)32 (highest)32 (highest)32 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend85 (highest)247662
Pricing power86
Returns on capital0512 (highest)3
Balance-sheet safety12 (highest)2 (highest)2 (highest)
Capital allocation41443960 (highest)
106% above value if growth stopped today97% above value if growth stopped today102% above value if growth stopped today95% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)
Market cap$28.1B$10.3B$450M$5.7B
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025