The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
REPX · Materials · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | ETD | ATR | AMPY | REPX |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 55 | 56 (highest) | 56 (highest) | 55 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 15 | 88 (highest) | 40 | 75 |
| Pricing power | 95 | 52 | 100 (highest) | — |
| Returns on capital | 40 | 32 | 16 | 55 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 73 | 55 | 100 (highest) | 47 |
| Capital allocation | 53 | 54 (highest) | 24 | 44 |
| 35% below value if growth stopped today | 145% above value if growth stopped today | 64% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 19% below value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $505M | $7.7B | $177M | $1.0B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |