The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
EUBG · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
OSK · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat
Wonderful & reasonably priced
STRA · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | EUBG | OSK | STRA | BLBD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 67 (highest) | 67 (highest) | 67 (highest) | 67 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 55 | 87 (highest) | 76 | 80 |
| Pricing power | 91 (highest) | 26 | — | 0 |
| Returns on capital | — | 65 | 11 | 93 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 100 (highest) | 63 | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 20 | 93 (highest) | 80 | 60 |
| 159% above value if growth stopped today | 20% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 107% above value if growth stopped today | 427% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $42.8M | $8.0B | $1.9B | $1.8B |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |