The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
EUDA · Healthcare · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
BNTC · Healthcare · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | EUDA | NTRA | BNTC | CERS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 40 (highest) | 40 (highest) | 40 (highest) | 40 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 0 | 60 | 50 | 65 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 55 | 62 | — | 84 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | — | 0 | 12 (highest) | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) | 28 |
| Capital discipline | 51 (highest) | 24 | 44 | 24 |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | No price data | No price data | No price data |
| Market cap | $20.4M | $36.7B | $305.8M | $605.2M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2022 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |