The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

EVI · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

DRVN · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

AN · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The capitalDiscipline component abstained: Not enough owner-earnings history to score capital discipline. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

PMNT · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureEVIDRVNANPMNT
Moat Score (0–100)4243 (highest)4242
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend6082 (highest)5037
Pricing power342860 (highest)
Returns on capital4553 (highest)
Balance-sheet safety33040 (highest)28
Capital allocation8084 (highest)44
No price data1989% above value if growth stopped todayNo price dataNo price data
Market capNot reported$2.2B$7.3B$3.8M
Moat tierShallow moatShallow moatShallow moatShallow moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2026