The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
EXE · Materials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
CLNV · Materials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | EXE | PRM | SNES | CLNV |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 36 (highest) | 36 (highest) | 36 (highest) | 36 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 25 | 43 | 65 (highest) | 20 |
| Pricing power | — | 53 | 43 | 72 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 9 (highest) | 0 | 0 | — |
| Balance-sheet safety | 65 (highest) | 28 | 28 | 28 |
| Capital allocation | 44 | 56 (highest) | 44 | 24 |
| No price data | 413% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | Not reported | $4.8B | $5.2M | $4.7M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2024 |