The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

EXFY · Technology · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

QMCO · Technology · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

FRQN · Technology · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

SKIL · Technology · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The businessTrend component abstained: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureEXFYQMCOFRQNSKIL
Moat Score (0–100)39 (highest)39 (highest)39 (highest)39 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend302078 (highest)
Pricing power94652798 (highest)
Returns on capital0 (highest)0 (highest)
Balance-sheet safety28 (highest)28 (highest)28 (highest)28 (highest)
Capital allocation44 (highest)44 (highest)2431
No price dataNo price dataNo price dataNo price data
Market cap$207M$367MNot reported$54.4M
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2026FY2024FY2026