The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
EXPO · Consumer Discretionary · Wide moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | EXPO | CPRT | ULTA | ANF |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 90 | 92 (highest) | 92 (highest) | 90 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 91 | 100 (highest) | 98 | 63 |
| Pricing power | — | 100 (highest) | 61 | 100 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 88 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 71 | 60 | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) |
| Price vs. high estimate | 68% above high estimate | 19% above high estimate | Around the high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | No price data |
| Market cap | $3.1B | $26.6B | $21.6B | — |
| Moat tier | Wide moat | Wide moat | Wide moat | Wide moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2026 |