The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

FAST · Consumer Discretionary · Wide moat

Wide moat

On the watchlist

LOPE · Consumer Discretionary · Wide moat

Wide moat

On the watchlist

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

CMG · Consumer Discretionary · Wide moat

Wide moat

On the watchlist

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

ORLY · Consumer Discretionary · Wide moat

Wide moat

On the watchlist

MeasureFASTLOPECMGORLY
Moat Score (0–100)89 (highest)89 (highest)89 (highest)89 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend92846595 (highest)
Pricing power7888 (highest)
Returns on capital100 (highest)100 (highest)97100 (highest)
Balance-sheet safety100 (highest)100 (highest)100 (highest)67
Capital allocation767395 (highest)95 (highest)
322% above value if growth stopped today60% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)203% above value if growth stopped today182% above value if growth stopped today
Market cap$54.0B$3.8B$41.4B$73.6B
Moat tierWide moatWide moatWide moatWide moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025