The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
RITE · Materials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The businessTrend component abstained: Only one aligned fiscal year of revenue and diluted EPS is available; a trend needs at least two observations. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | FBIN | RITE | CMT | HOS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 35 (highest) | 35 (highest) | 35 (highest) | 35 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 20 | — | 49 | 75 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 48 | 62 (highest) | 8 | 0 |
| Returns on capital | 36 (highest) | 0 | 27 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 17 | 55 | 73 (highest) | 55 |
| Capital allocation | 54 (highest) | 24 | 19 | 44 |
| 8% below value if growth stopped today | No price data | 44% above value if growth stopped today | 32% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $4.8B | $7.5M | $195M | $1.0B |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |