The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
CVLG · Industrials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | FCUV | PLUG | LCUT | CVLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 20 (highest) | 20 (highest) | 20 (highest) | 20 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 20 | 48 (highest) | 5 | 35 |
| Pricing power | 0 | 0 | 63 (highest) | — |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 0 | 7 | 10 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 (highest) | 28 | 0 | 13 |
| Capital allocation | 24 (highest) | 24 (highest) | 24 (highest) | 20 |
| No price data | No price data | 112% above value if growth stopped today | 105% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $2.1M | Not reported | $197M | $1.3B |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |