The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
FDXF · Industrials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | FDXF | GTEC | FTEK | TDDWW |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 35 (highest) | 35 (highest) | 35 (highest) | 35 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 13 | 21 | 35 | 85 (highest) |
| Pricing power | — | 28 | 62 (highest) | 0 |
| Returns on capital | 88 (highest) | 37 | 0 | 7 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 19 | 73 (highest) | 55 | 58 |
| Capital allocation | 20 | 19 | 24 (highest) | 24 (highest) |
| 23% above value if growth stopped today | 76% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | $18.9B | $16.5M | $47.4M | Not reported |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |