The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
CC · Materials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
OI · Materials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The balanceSheet component abstained: Insufficient leverage/coverage inputs to score the balance sheet. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | FF | CC | ALB | OI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 29 (highest) | 29 (highest) | 29 (highest) | 29 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 10 | 31 | 55 (highest) | 36 |
| Pricing power | 0 | 22 | 29 (highest) | 28 |
| Returns on capital | 63 (highest) | — | 25 | 7 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 (highest) | 0 | 0 | — |
| Capital allocation | 43 | 64 (highest) | 35 | 44 |
| 7% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 152% above value if growth stopped today | 741% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | |
| Market cap | $248M | $1.9B | $11.6B | Not reported |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |