The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

FFAI · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The businessTrend component abstained: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

ATVK · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

CVEO · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

HLEO · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureFFAIATVKCVEOHLEO
Moat Score (0–100)2425 (highest)25 (highest)24
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend35 (highest)340
Pricing power01626 (highest)
Returns on capital09 (highest)0
Balance-sheet safety55 (highest)282528
Capital allocation422849 (highest)44
No price data4424% above value if growth stopped today46% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)No price data
Market capNot reported$47.9M$396M$46.5M
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025