The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
RICK · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
On the watchlist
| Measure | FFLO | BARK | CVSA | RICK |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 51 | 52 (highest) | 51 | 51 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 78 (highest) | 60 | 64 | 78 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 63 | 99 | 55 | 100 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 0 | 19 | 20 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) | 54 | 0 |
| Capital discipline | 60 | 44 | 64 (highest) | 58 |
| Price vs. high estimate | 45% above high estimate | No price data | 119% above high estimate | 30% below high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) |
| Market cap | $2.5M | $81.0M | $4.1B | $228.8M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 |