The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
PAMT · Industrials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | FGI | KITT | TPICQ | PAMT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 17 (highest) | 17 (highest) | 17 (highest) | 16 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 10 | 15 (highest) | 15 (highest) | 12 |
| Pricing power | 30 (highest) | 0 | 0 | — |
| Returns on capital | 20 (highest) | 0 | 17 | 7 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 0 | 28 (highest) | 28 (highest) | 0 |
| Capital allocation | 24 | 44 (highest) | 24 | 44 (highest) |
| 32% below value if growth stopped today | No price data | No price data | 54% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $14.4M | $54.3M | $341362 | $250M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |