The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
GXAI · Technology · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | FIS | GXAI | GSIT | IZEA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 37 (highest) | 37 (highest) | 37 (highest) | 37 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 61 | 70 (highest) | 20 | 13 |
| Pricing power | 60 | — | 86 (highest) | 73 |
| Returns on capital | 0 (highest) | 0 (highest) | 0 (highest) | 0 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 14 | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 50 (highest) | 24 | 24 | 44 |
| Price vs. high estimate | 9% below high estimate | No price data | No price data | No price data |
| Market cap | $21.4B | $7.6M | $206M | $58.7M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 |