The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
MAPS · Technology · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | FISV | RDDT | DBX | MAPS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 67 | 68 (highest) | 67 | 67 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 94 (highest) | 78 | 83 | 25 |
| Pricing power | 100 (highest) | 99 | 90 | 100 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 31 (highest) | 18 | 0 | — |
| Balance-sheet safety | 32 | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 80 (highest) | 44 | 64 | 44 |
| Price vs. high estimate | 66% below high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | No price data | 20% above high estimate | No price data |
| Market cap | $27.3B | $34.1B | $8.0B | Not reported |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |