The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
CLMB · Industrials · Narrow moat
Wonderful & reasonably priced
| Measure | FIX | EACO | CLMB | IBP |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 79 (highest) | 79 (highest) | 79 (highest) | 79 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 100 (highest) | 95 | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 31 | 49 (highest) | 23 | 49 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 100 (highest) | 74 | 97 | 83 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 73 | 99 | 100 (highest) | 63 |
| Capital discipline | 91 | 80 | 78 | 100 (highest) |
| Price vs. high estimate | 948% above high estimate | 28% above high estimate | 48% below high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | 40% above high estimate |
| Market cap | $61.0B | $491M | $117M | $6.1B |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |