The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
SGC · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
JCTC · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
| Measure | FLL | SGC | III | JCTC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 35 (highest) | 35 (highest) | 35 (highest) | 35 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 50 (highest) | 38 | 29 | 10 |
| Pricing power | 100 (highest) | 60 | 68 | 27 |
| Returns on capital | 0 | — | 11 | 37 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 0 | 19 | 42 | 55 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 24 | 23 | 24 | 44 (highest) |
| No price data | Around the value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 68% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | |
| Market cap | $84.2M | $194M | $184M | Not reported |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |