The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
FLY · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
III · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
ONEW · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The businessTrend component abstained: Only one aligned fiscal year of revenue and diluted EPS is available; a trend needs at least two observations. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
HNST · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
| Measure | FLY | III | ONEW | HNST |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 41 (highest) | 41 (highest) | 41 (highest) | 41 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 60 | 61 (highest) | — | 56 |
| Pricing power | 7 | 68 (highest) | 35 | 51 |
| Returns on capital | — | 11 | 58 (highest) | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 (highest) | 42 | 28 | 55 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 44 (highest) | 24 | 44 (highest) | 44 (highest) |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | 76% above high estimate | No price data | No price data |
| Market cap | $3.1B | $193.0M | — | $436.6M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |