The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
VENU · Communications · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
LION · Communications · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
CLUS · Communications · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The businessTrend component abstained: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | FLZH | VENU | LION | CLUS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 25 | 26 (highest) | 25 | 25 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 15 | 31 (highest) | 27 | — |
| Pricing power | 11 (highest) | — | — | 0 |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 0 | 31 (highest) | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 (highest) | 28 | 0 | 55 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 44 (highest) | 44 (highest) | 44 (highest) | 44 (highest) |
| No price data | No price data | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | $899804 | $102M | Not reported | Not reported |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 |