The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
FRGT · Industrials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
CHSCP · Industrials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The businessTrend component abstained: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
JBLU · Industrials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | FRGT | CHSCP | GNLN | JBLU |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 23 (highest) | 23 (highest) | 23 (highest) | 23 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 20 | — | 10 | 60 (highest) |
| Pricing power | — | 7 (highest) | 6 | — |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 4 | 0 | 7 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 27 | 55 (highest) | 0 |
| Capital allocation | 45 | 56 (highest) | 44 | 24 |
| No price data | No price data | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | $6.6M | Not reported | $1.3M | $1.9B |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2024 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |