The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
FDXF · Industrials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | FTEK | OUST | GTEC | FDXF |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 35 (highest) | 35 (highest) | 35 (highest) | 35 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 35 | 60 (highest) | 21 | 13 |
| Pricing power | 62 (highest) | 18 | 28 | — |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 0 | 37 | 88 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 | 55 | 73 (highest) | 19 |
| Capital allocation | 24 | 44 (highest) | 19 | 20 |
| No price data | No price data | 83% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 8% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $44.1M | $1.9B | $11.5M | $16.5B |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 |