The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
CLNV · Materials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
OVV · Materials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
RITE · Materials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The businessTrend component abstained: Only one aligned fiscal year of revenue and diluted EPS is available; a trend needs at least two observations. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | FTK | CLNV | OVV | RITE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 36 (highest) | 36 (highest) | 36 (highest) | 35 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 80 (highest) | 20 | 25 | — |
| Pricing power | 0 | 72 (highest) | — | 62 |
| Returns on capital | 8 | — | 44 (highest) | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 46 | 28 | 36 | 55 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 44 (highest) | 24 | 37 | 24 |
| 567% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | Around the value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | No price data | |
| Market cap | $779M | $4.1M | $16.0B | $13M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2025 | FY2025 |