The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
FUSE · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
QMCI · Technology · Shallow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | FUSE | QMCI | INTA | PSN |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 53 (highest) | 53 (highest) | 53 (highest) | 52 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 20 | 62 | 70 | 84 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 93 | 78 | 96 (highest) | 40 |
| Returns on capital | — | — | 0 | 8 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 (highest) | 28 | 55 (highest) | 51 |
| Capital discipline | 43 | 44 | 44 | 80 (highest) |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | 31% below high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | No price data | 28% below high estimate |
| Market cap | $27.6M | $13.6M | $2.4B | $3.1B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |