The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
FWRG · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | FWRG | GXXM | DCO | QVCAQ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 31 | 32 (highest) | 31 | 31 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 80 (highest) | 55 | 48 | 0 |
| Pricing power | — | 31 | 30 | 58 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 20 | 28 | 55 (highest) | 28 |
| Capital allocation | 24 | 44 | 24 | 64 (highest) |
| 250% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | No price data | 486% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | |
| Market cap | $736M | $138M | $2.6B | $322040 |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2023 | FY2025 | FY2025 |