The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
PRKS · Communications · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | GAIA | ZD | RSVR | PRKS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 46 | 48 (highest) | 48 (highest) | 46 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 51 | 36 | 60 (highest) | 53 |
| Pricing power | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 98 | — |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 29 | 0 | 49 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 (highest) | 35 | 0 | 2 |
| Capital allocation | 24 | 40 | 80 (highest) | 80 (highest) |
| No price data | 5% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 97% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | |
| Market cap | $46.5M | $2.0B | $697M | Not reported |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 |