The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
GBUX · Technology · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
BELFA · Technology · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The businessTrend component abstained: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | GBUX | BELFA | CREX | KE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 38 (highest) | 38 (highest) | 38 (highest) | 38 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 57 | — | 63 (highest) | 38 |
| Pricing power | 42 | 22 | 54 (highest) | 24 |
| Returns on capital | — | 30 (highest) | 0 | 25 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 55 | 28 | 66 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 24 | 44 (highest) | 44 (highest) | 35 |
| No price data | No price data | 356% above value if growth stopped today | 91% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $39625 | Not reported | $28.3M | $594M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 |