The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
RMR · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | GCO | ICFI | ACM | RMR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 51 (highest) | 51 (highest) | 51 (highest) | 51 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 35 | 69 | 85 (highest) | 10 |
| Pricing power | 68 (highest) | 63 | 5 | — |
| Returns on capital | 13 | 14 | 30 | 100 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 100 (highest) | 35 | 51 | 74 |
| Capital allocation | 40 | 75 | 85 (highest) | 20 |
| No price data | 8% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 143% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | |
| Market cap | Not reported | $1.5B | $9.3B | Not reported |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |