The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
GDRX · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
WDAY · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | GDRX | WDAY | DTST | ZIP |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 45 (highest) | 45 (highest) | 45 (highest) | 45 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 63 | 90 (highest) | 60 | 10 |
| Pricing power | — | — | 60 | 100 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 0 | 4 | 41 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 37 | 44 | 55 (highest) | 28 |
| Capital allocation | 78 (highest) | 44 | 44 | 44 |
| 12% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | No price data | 318% above value if growth stopped today | 259% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $1.1B | Not reported | $24.3M | $278M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 |