The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
WK · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | GDYN | LSCC | SLP | WK |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 53 (highest) | 53 (highest) | 53 (highest) | 53 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 80 (highest) | 36 | 60 | 60 |
| Pricing power | 61 | 93 | 92 | 99 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 9 | 39 (highest) | 33 | — |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 | 73 (highest) | 55 | 28 |
| Capital allocation | 59 (highest) | 24 | 24 | 24 |
| No price data | 1197% above value if growth stopped today | 151% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | No price data | |
| Market cap | $680M | $14.6B | $373M | $4.3B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |