The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
SHC · Healthcare · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The balanceSheet component abstained: Insufficient leverage/coverage inputs to score the balance sheet. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | GEHC | CPIX | SHC | MIR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 50 (highest) | 50 (highest) | 50 (highest) | 50 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 54 | 47 | 51 | 80 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 70 | 98 (highest) | 92 | 71 |
| Returns on capital | 63 (highest) | 0 | 12 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 41 | 55 (highest) | — | 53 |
| Capital allocation | 21 | 48 (highest) | 44 | 44 |
| No price data | No price data | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | Not reported | $98.9M | Not reported | Not reported |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |