The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
SAIL · Technology · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | GEN | PLXS | SAIL | DV |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 65 (highest) | 65 (highest) | 65 (highest) | 65 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 80 | 72 | 60 | 90 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 100 (highest) | 27 | 99 | 100 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 40 | 75 (highest) | — | 8 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 18 | 66 | 55 | 73 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 83 (highest) | 83 (highest) | 44 | 52 |
| 30% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 342% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | 124% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $15.5B | $6.8B | $8.4B | $1.7B |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 |