The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
GENK · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | GENK | RENT | BWMG | CRWS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 30 (highest) | 30 (highest) | 30 (highest) | 30 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 57 | 80 (highest) | 65 | 22 |
| Pricing power | — | 0 | 35 | 44 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 12 | 0 | 0 | 37 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 28 | 28 | 40 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 24 | 44 (highest) | 24 | 6 |
| 80% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | No price data | No price data | 48% below value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $10.2M | Not reported | $2.7M | $32.2M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2026 |