The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
GEO · Industrials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | GEO | LCUT | ORN | CAPC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 27 (highest) | 27 (highest) | 27 (highest) | 26 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 63 | 39 | 77 (highest) | 24 |
| Pricing power | — | 63 (highest) | 0 | 7 |
| Returns on capital | 11 (highest) | 7 | 4 | 10 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 0 | 0 | 52 | 55 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 31 | 24 | 0 | 36 (highest) |
| Price vs. high estimate | 75% above high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | 113% above high estimate | No price data | No price data |
| Market cap | $4.2B | $197.8M | $505.9M | — |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |